Terraform + AWS: From giant states to 3-minute deployments
“We haven’t touched our AWS infrastructure in three months out of fear of breaking something.” Sound familiar? The solution isn’t to change tools—it’s to change your methodology.
The lie we’ve believed
We all start the same: “Let’s do Infrastructure as Code—it’ll be amazing.” And indeed, the first few days are magical. You create your first VPC, security groups, a few instances… Everything works. You feel like a wizard.
Then reality hits.
Six months later, you have gigantic state files, tightly coupled modules, and every change feels like a game of Russian roulette. Does this sound familiar?
terraform plan→ 20 minutes of waiting- A 400-line plan that no one understands
- “Are you sure you want to apply this?”
- Three hours debugging because something failed on line 247
But there’s one factor most teams overlook…
What actually works (and why no one tells you)
After rescuing dozens of Terraform projects, the formula is simpler than you think:
Small states + smart modules + GitOps that doesn’t scare you.
Layered states (not per project)
Forget “one state to rule them all.” Break it down like this:
terraform/
├── network/ # VPC, subnets, NAT gateways
├── data/ # RDS, ElastiCache
├── compute/ # EKS, ECS, ASGs
└── apps/ # ALBs, Route53Each layer evolves independently. The data team can update RDS without touching the network. This could be your game changer.
The remote state trick
The magic is in connecting layers without coupling them:
data "terraform_remote_state" "network" {
backend = "s3"
config = {
bucket = "company-terraform-states"
key = "network/terraform.tfstate"
}
}
# Use outputs from another layer
subnet_id = data.terraform_remote_state.network.outputs.private_subnet_idModules that don’t give you a headache
Create specific modules for each type of workload:
secure-webapp/– ALB + WAF + instancesmicroservice/– EKS service + ingress + monitoringdata-pipeline/– Lambda + SQS + RDS with backups
No more “universal” modules requiring 47 parameters.
Multi-cloud is already here
Now it gets interesting. Many teams are adopting hybrid strategies: AWS for critical applications, OpenStack for development and testing.
Why? Cost and control.
# Same module, different cloud
module "webapp" {
source = "./modules/webapp"
# On OpenStack for dev
provider = openstack.dev
instance_type = "m1.medium"
# On AWS for prod
# provider = aws.prod
# instance_type = "t3.medium"
}The future isn’t “AWS or nothing.” It’s architectural flexibility. The power to choose the solution you want, when you want, adapted to your budget.
OpenTofu changes the game
With the recent changes in Terraform, OpenTofu is becoming the smart choice. Same syntax, open-source governance, zero vendor lock-in.
The advantage is huge: you can migrate gradually without changing a single line of code. Perfect for teams that want control without drama.
The question you should ask yourself
Did your last terraform apply take years off your life?
If yes, the problem isn’t technical—it’s methodological.
Do you recognize these symptoms in your team? The difference between success and chaos lies in applying the right techniques from the start.
If you want to dive deeper into these methodologies, our Terraform/OpenTofu courses cover everything from fundamentals to advanced GitOps with real multi-cloud use cases.
