IBM Storage CEPH vs. Storage Scale (GPFS), GFS2, NFS and SMB

IBM Storage CEPH is a software-defined storage solution based on open source ceph technology that is gaining more and more followers. It offers a scalable, resilient and high-performance storage system. It is especially suited for environments that require massive, distributed storage, such as data centers, cloud applications and big data environments.

What are the main Use Cases?

  1. Object Storage: Ideal for storing massive amounts of unstructured data, such as images, videos and backup files.
  2. Block Storage: Used for file systems, databases and virtual machines, offering high availability and performance.
  3. Distributed File Systems: Supports applications that require concurrent access to files from multiple nodes.

Technical Fundamentals

  • Scalable Structure: It is based on a distributed architecture that allows scaling horizontally, adding more nodes as needed.
  • High Availability: Designed to be resilient to failures, with redundancy and automatic data recovery.
  • Data Consistency: Ensures data integrity and consistency even in high concurrency environments.

Comparison with other storage solutions

  1. Versus GPFS (IBM Spectrum Scale):
    • CEPH is best suited for environments where massive scalability and a highly flexible storage infrastructure are needed.
    • GPFS offers superior performance in environments where high I/O throughput and efficient management of large numbers of small files is required.
  2. Before NFS and SMB:
    • NFS and SMB are shared storage protocols that work well for sharing files on local networks. CEPH offers a more robust and scalable solution for large-scale and distributed environments.
    • CEPH provides greater fault tolerance and more efficient data management for large data volumes.
  3. Vs GFS2:
    • GFS2 is suitable for cluster environments with shared data access, but CEPH offers superior scalability and flexibility.
    • CEPH excels in object and block storage scenarios, while GFS2 focuses more on file storage.

When is GPFS (Storage Scale) a better solution than CEPH?

When very high I/O performance is required

  • GPFS is designed to provide very high I/O performance, especially in environments requiring high input/output (I/O) throughput and low latency. It is particularly effective in applications that handle large numbers of small files or in environments with heavy I/O workloads.

If we have to manage small files in a very efficient manner

  • GPFS excels at efficiently managing large numbers of small files, a common scenario in high-performance computing and analysis environments.

In HPC environments

  • In high performance computing (HPC) environments, where consistency and reliability are crucial along with high performance, GPFS provides a more robust and optimized platform.

When we need advanced functions such as an ILM

  • For applications that require advanced handling of unstructured data with features such as data deduplication, compression and data lifecycle management, GPFS can have more specialized functions.


In summary, GPFS is preferable to CEPH in scenarios where high I/O throughput, efficient small file management, and in HPC environments where consistency and reliability are as important as performance. In addition, in environments that are already deeply integrated with IBM solutions, GPFS can offer better synergy and optimized performance.

However, in our opinion, IBM CEPH is best suited in scenarios where a highly scalable storage solution is required, with object, block and file storage capabilities, and where data integrity and availability are critical. It stands out compared to NFS, SMB and GFS2 in terms of scalability, flexibility and ability to handle large volumes of distributed data.

That is, neither one nor the other, it all depends on the workloads and use cases. Contact us!

SiXe Ingeniería
× ¡Hola! Bonjour! Hello!